Re: Is beepcore-c still alive? What happened to Huston?
Wolfgang Spraul <[email protected]> Tue, 18 Feb 2003 20:19:33 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.beep.beepcore.c.general |
|---|---|
| Organization | Q AG |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Well, I read several things: 1) beepcore-c has a X11 type of license (i.e. can be used in proprietary products) whereas roadrunner has a GPL type of license (i.e. free software only). beepcore-c is in the debian/unstable distribution whereas roadrunner is not. Would it be a problem to create a debian package for roadrunner? I don't think so. 2) beepcore-c is supposedly "light" (?) and has less dependencies than roadrunner (libxml2?) I read that beepcore-c just hooks into a socket whereas roadrunner manages the complete connection. Please correct me if I'm wrong. As you can tell, I haven't started actually using the two libraries yet. My current plan is to just start coding my project (a Calendar Access Protocol server and cgi) and initially try both libraries, then make a decision after a few days. Regards, Wolfgang On Tuesday 18 February 2003 17:58, Marshall Rose wrote: > > Hi everybody, > > > > I'm trying to device whether to use beepcore-c or roadrunner for an > > upcoming project. > > I found pros and cons, but I noticed that the last CVS commit in > > beepcore-c happened on Sept 19 last year (bp_wrapper.h). Is anybody still > > working on beepcore-c? Or is beepcore-c simply working well enough that > > one can just use it? Is the BEEP protocol sufficiently/completely > > implemented? > > > > Huston - are you still maintaining the project? > > hi. a couple of things: > > i think that huston is focusing more on the beepcore-java stuff these > days... > > there's a lot of activity on roadrunner, and i don't think it makes a lot > of sense for folks to try to maintain two open source beep implementations > in C.... > > so, while i haven't heard from huston in a while, i wouldn't be surprised > to hear folks suggest that we close down beepcore-c... > > can someone make a compelling argument as to some feature that beepcore-c > has that roadrunner doesn't? if so, then we should think about this > further... > > thanks! > > /MTR ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf