Re: CVS availability?
Mihai Ibanescu <[email protected]> Tue, 29 Oct 2002 16:27:16 -0500 (EST)
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.beep.roadrunner.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <Pine.LNX.4.44.0210291619090.1724-100000@roadrunner.devel.redhat.com> |
On 29 Oct 2002, Jonas Borgström wrote: > Mihai Ibanescu <[email protected]> writes: > > > I am running into troubles while trying to compile pyrr. > > My configuration: > > > > Red Hat Linux 7.3, autoconf-2.13, automake-1.4p5, python-2.2 > > > > Basically I had to use the attached patch to compile pyrr. > > Is my system totally different than yours? > > > > For once, as far as I can tell autoheader and autoconf by default look for > > a `configure.in' file, not `configure.ac'. Is there a missing step in > > creating the configure.in file, that I missed? > > > > autoconf >= 2.5 will look for configure.ac > > > Also, what is the rationale for linking with -l$(PYTHON_VERSION)? I've > > never seen a /usr/lib/libpython2.2.so or something similar to that. > > > > Do you only have libpython.so? If so I guess you can't have multiple > python version installed. Oh, I found it, but on Red Hat it's stored as: /usr/lib/python1.5/config/libpython1.5.a /usr/lib/python2.2/config/libpython2.2.a I am not sure you have to link against python if you are using dynamic libraries, but I may be wrong. Anyway, WORKSFORME withoud -lpython2.2 Misa