Re: Measuring throughput

Sean Whitney <[email protected]> Fri, 28 Sep 2007 11:22:04 -0700
Newsgroups gmane.network.cricket.user
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Sometimes I'm a little thick ;-)
I guess I don't understand.

If a SNMP octet counter has incremented from 24 to 48, that says to  
me that 24 octets of data have passed.  If I multiple that by 8 I get  
192 bits.  I don't understand where the difference between base 2 and  
base 10 come into play.  192 decimal or 1100 0000 binary is still the  
same number.

SNMP is returning a base 10 number, so I don't understand the point  
about collection in base 2 or base 10.

Thanks in Advance,

Se

=======================================
Sean Whitney
PMB #435, 1901 NE 162nd Ave, Suite D105
Vancouver, WA 98684
T. 360.607.7945
F. 815.364.0687
aim: seanmwhitney
email: [email protected]
=======================================



On Sep 28, 2007, at 1:28 AM, <[email protected]>  
<[email protected]> wrote:

>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: [email protected]
>> [mailto:[email protected]] On
>> Behalf Of Sean Whitney
>> Sent: Friday, September 28, 2007 02:05
>> To: Cricket List
>> Subject: [cricket-users] Measuring throughput
>>
>> what I'm not sure I understand it bytes = true.
>>
>> ...
>>
>>      The numbers on the vertical axis of a graph are scaled
>> by powers
>> of 2 if the bytes tag is set to true for any of the datasources on
>> the graph.
>>
>> However when I look else where on the net.  It's very clear that
>> network traffic is measure in base 10.
>
> Most of this is irrelevant. Cricket just represents the data it is
> given. bytes = true only affects the way cricket does it's  
> rounding, so
> either on a base 2 or a base 10. The right choice for true or false  
> here
> is the way your equipment gives the data. If your data is collected in
> base 2, then it should be set to bytes = true.
>
> Most network gear spits out it's data in base 2 (and octets, not  
> bits),
> even if they call it kilo instead of kibi or whatever.
>
> To answer your question: for most usage scenarios at the present  
> day the
> default is correct.
>
> // nick
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- 
> ---
> This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
> Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005.
> http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
> _______________________________________________
> cricket-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/cricket-users


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/