Re: dnscache and oversized answers
Sami Farin <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.djbdns |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Tue, Oct 07, 2008 at 20:28:37 -0600, Andy Bradford wrote: > Thus said John Levine on 06 Oct 2008 10:55:12 -0000: ... > > The problem turns out to be that XO's name servers are putting in too > > many additional section records and are returning oversized answers of > > about 540 bytes, which dnscache then throws away. > > I assume this is because XO's name servers aren't setting the truncated > bit? Yes. -- "Success is going from failure to failure with great enthusiasm." - Sir Winston Churchill
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 197 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux) iEQEAREKAAYFAkjsfTcACgkQMCYCLUwuV18JEQCXWQfzEIxTA2pb9MwyvAuckw+b 8wCYhCQYb0R9ZKDBhqsrPYrgRpSVHA== =+Q7t -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----