Re: dnscache and oversized answers
John L <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.djbdns |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
>> One of my users noticed that MX lookups for xo.net were timing out. > > Has this been reported to XO? Granted they may not fix it, but it > doesn't hurt to point out their stupidity. If I could figure out who to tell, I would. > Failing that, why not just take their highest preference MX record and > put it into your smtproutes file and be done with it. Sure, you won't > get any updates, but then their DNS is broken so what can they expect. Take a look at them. Their servers are doing load balancing by rotating the answers. I did stick in an smtproute entry, but the recently offered patch will let dnscache deal with the next funky DNS server without having to hand edit stuff. >> The problem turns out to be that XO's name servers are putting in too >> many additional section records and are returning oversized answers of >> about 540 bytes, which dnscache then throws away. > > I assume this is because XO's name servers aren't setting the truncated > bit? No, take a look at them. It's because they're returning answers bigger than 512. The answers have large additional sections which I'd just trim back to fit. Regards, John Levine, [email protected], Primary Perpetrator of "The Internet for Dummies", Information Superhighwayman wanna-be, http://www.johnlevine.com, ex-Mayor "More Wiener schnitzel, please", said Tom, revealingly.