Re: dnscache and oversized answers

On Wed, Oct 08, 2008 at 12:28:23 +0300, Sami Farin wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 07, 2008 at 20:28:37 -0600, Andy Bradford wrote:
> > Thus said John Levine on 06 Oct 2008 10:55:12 -0000:
> ...
> > > The problem turns out to be that  XO's name servers are putting in too
> > > many additional section records and are returning oversized answers of
> > > about 540 bytes, which dnscache then throws away.
> > 
> > I assume this is because XO's  name servers aren't setting the truncated
> > bit?
> 
> Yes.

No.  I meant that they aren't setting truncated bit ;)
But check for packet size is earlier.

-- 
"A good plan violently executed now is better
 than the perfect plan next week." - General George Patton

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEAREKAAYFAkjsgJsACgkQMCYCLUwuV18kqACgnfyBQr2TFTEpqs+eVdDrPBzd
H2oAn0i9CeKEakqw17rnvalWDNy+mQmU
=cUB2
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----