Re: Potentially Predatory Pre-Announcement of Possible Vaporware (zinq-djbdns-0.01)

Daryl Tester wrote:
> (* Note Replyto *)
> 
> Robin Bowes wrote:
> 
>> 2. I posted a request on the BIND list recently asking for zonefiles 
>> to use to test a bind2djbdns script that I *will* get round to writing 
>> soon.
> 
> There's a couple of conversion scripts already on tinydns.org, and a
> few hits last time I googled.

There's always room for a better mousetrap :)

> 
>> I didn't get many responses, but I got one from one "Alan Clegg" (from 
>> ISC) making the point that djbdns does not support dnssec. He sent a 
>> follow-up stating:
> ...
>> So, DNSSEC support would be a "Good Thing" to have.
> 
> This has been thrashed out on the list before -
> 
> <http://marc.info/?l=djbdns&w=2&r=1&s=dnssec&q=b>
> 
> I think we're still outstanding a tinydns "exploit" as well.  Intriguing
> innuendo.

I didn't say DNSSEC was/is a "Good Thing" - I've not got sufficient 
information to take a view - but that having the option to use it with 
djbdns would be a "Good Thing". It would eliminate the "can't use djbdns 
because it doesn't do DNSSEC" argument.

R.