Re: djbdns/dnscache poisoning weakness

Mark Johnson <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.network.djbdns
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Mon, Feb 9, 2009 at 8:25 PM, Dean Anderson <[email protected]> wrote:
> I recommend ignoring these patches and avoiding any server that uses
> these patches.
>
> I have discovered that Kaminsky was searching for open recursors roughly
> during the time of the first open recursor attack reported in October
> 2005.  Kaminsky reported finding about 500,000 open recursors at
> Schmoocon in January 2006.
>
> When the 'DNS cache scare' started last summer, Kaminsky tried to get
> people to convert to David Ulevitch's OpenDNS service. The scare also
> prompted efforts to promote DNSSEC.  These are "scare" scams, not
> legitimate threats for which people should change DNS software.
>
> Previous analysis of the Kevin Day/Dan Kaminsky proposed changes to
> DNSCACHE revealed that they would ADD EXTREME WEAKNESS not fix weakness,
> making it possible to poison a cache in about 1000 messages. I have not
> yet analyzed the BIND changes, and do not know if they suffer the same
> weaknesses as the DNSCACHE changes.

Pot.  Kettle.  Black.  You're engaging in the same kind of scare
tactics that you accuse Kevin of.
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.