Re: djbdns: Current recommended patches?

On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 4:28 PM, Andrew Richards
<[email protected]> wrote:
> I had seen the 2nd one but didn't include it since this relates to
> copying the cdb file into place (wrong: not atomic) rather than moving
> it (right) - GMANE/12705. If it does (just) what it intends to
> however, I see that would be useful. Thinks: Given copy isn't atomic,
> can half-a-cdb-file be read in during an incomplete copy, resulting in
> incomplete data with this patch?

Don't confuse what the patch is actually fixing with how it was
discovered.  A file descriptor leak is something that should be fixed.