Re: Classes other then IN
Laurent Bercot <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.djbdns |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
> Beyond the technical aegis of DNS there is the perhaps > less tangible ideal or some sense of freedom. Fighting a political battle with technical weapons does not work. Technical weapons can be used by every side. Sometimes freedom wins (TCP/IP vs. MSN), sometimes it doesn't (LDAP vs. Active Directory). The whole purpose of GNU was to fight a political war. It accomplished its goals quite well. And it's also a technical mess that could probably match Microsoft Windows, because it was designed with some idea of freedom in mind, instead of software quality (no matter what die-hard GNU fans might say). And everytime, the user loses, because protocols are made more complex and hard to implement, and every new piece of software introduces new bugs. Also, when complexity increases, it becomes difficult for alternative implementors to maintain free software. Look at web browsers: there is NO good free web browser out there, because it's extremely hard to write a browser nowadays (*), and only big companies with huge manpower can afford it. So, waging political wars on technical grounds is not a good strategy for a defender of freedom. Please keep political issues *separate* from technical issues. I am not saying they are not important; I am saying it is also important to avoid misusing communication protocols and software by assigning them non-technical goals. (*) No, Mozilla Firefox is not good. Needing a power plant and more than 200 megabytes of RAM to start, then randomly crashing, should not even be considered *acceptable* for a computer program that's supposed to display web pages. -- Laurent