Re: difference in dnscache installs

richard lucassen <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.network.djbdns
Organization XAQ Systems
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Wed, 20 Jan 2010 22:07:38 +1030
Daryl Tester <[email protected]> wrote:

> > Do you guys have another hint what can be done?
> 
> I'm sure CNAME/Akamai type issues have been discussed on the list
> before, let's see, dredge dredge dredge ... aha.  This thread -
> 
> <http://marc.info/?t=109422162200001&r=1&w=2>
> 
> And this "patch" -
> 
> <http://marc.info/?l=djbdns&m=109509877832495&w=2>
> 
> May help.  Or may not.

The problem is in fact that I'm forced to fsck up a well working dns
due to some incapable dns administrators. And I could patch djbdns
(thanks Hugo!) in order to workaround this problem, but in that case
I'd rather opt for having multiple instances of dnscache to lower the
load per dns (question remains if that wil help, it provides no real
solution).

R.

-- 
___________________________________________________________________
It is better to remain silent and be thought a fool, than to speak
aloud and remove all doubt.

+------------------------------------------------------------------+
| Richard Lucassen, Utrecht                                        |
| Public key and email address:                                    |
| http://www.lucassen.org/mail-pubkey.html                         |
+------------------------------------------------------------------+
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.