Re: Quick Poll: Would you trust system software from an anonymous source?
"Andrew Richards" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.djbdns |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Friday 26 February 2010 18:05:18 Dean Anderson wrote: > By anonymous, I mean a source that traces only to an email address with > no phone number, no address, no anything. Not even a significant > history of email from that account. This source has no accountability, > because they are anonymous. > > By 'System software' I mean software whose integrity a company relies on > to perform its functions. If the software were remotely exploitable, it > could potentially result in remote access being obtained, and/or > confidential information being exposed, firewall being circumvented, etc > > Here are the specific questions: > > 1. Would you trust (meaning use) system software from an anonymous > source? > > 2. Would the fact that the software is a derivative of well known > software, but with apparently gratuitous "security fixes": would that > increase or decrease your willingness to trust the software? > > 3. Would the fact that source implements a variation of discredited > changes advocated by gray-hat or black-hat hackers increase or decrease > your willingness to trust the software? > > 4. Would you consider it a bad judgment to use such software knowing (1) > for sure, and perhaps (2) and (3)? How serious is the bad judgment? > > 5. Would it be reasonable to fire the admin responsible if they knew of > (1), and perhaps (2),and (3), but used it anyway? > > 6. Does the reasonableness of termination depend on actually knowing > (1)? That is, supposing the admin didn't know (1), should the admin have > made an effort to find out if the software was from a dependable (or at > least accountable) source? > > Please reply off list. Dean: It seems you're determined to spread FUD about all of the people who are actually doing significant amounts of work on DJB software including DNScurve - also noting your other determined assaults a few months back. I'm not sure whether you're being malicious or paranoid: I understand the technical motivation for the latter but I think you've taken this far beyond healthy scepticism. Andrew. -- ==================================================================== * Custom email solutions * Systems Administration * Networking http://www.acrconsulting.co.uk/email/qmail.html ====================================================================