Re: Quick Poll: Would you trust system software from an anonymous source?

"Andrew Richards" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.network.djbdns
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Friday 26 February 2010 18:05:18 Dean Anderson wrote:
> By anonymous, I mean a source that traces only to an email address with
> no phone number, no address, no anything.  Not even a significant
> history of email from that account.  This source has no accountability,
> because they are anonymous.
> 
> By 'System software' I mean software whose integrity a company relies on
> to perform its functions. If the software were remotely exploitable, it
> could potentially result in remote access being obtained, and/or
> confidential information being exposed, firewall being circumvented, etc
> 
> Here are the specific questions:
> 
> 1. Would you trust (meaning use) system software from an anonymous
> source?
> 
> 2. Would the fact that the software is a derivative of well known
> software, but with apparently gratuitous "security fixes": would that
> increase or decrease your willingness to trust the software?
> 
> 3. Would the fact that source implements a variation of discredited
> changes advocated by gray-hat or black-hat hackers increase or decrease
> your willingness to trust the software?
> 
> 4. Would you consider it a bad judgment to use such software knowing (1)
> for sure, and perhaps (2) and (3)?  How serious is the bad judgment?
> 
> 5. Would it be reasonable to fire the admin responsible if they knew of
> (1), and perhaps (2),and (3), but used it anyway?
> 
> 6. Does the reasonableness of termination depend on actually knowing
> (1)? That is, supposing the admin didn't know (1), should the admin have
> made an effort to find out if the software was from a dependable (or at
> least accountable) source?
> 
> Please reply off list.

Dean: It seems you're determined to spread FUD about all of the people who 
are actually doing significant amounts of work on DJB software including 
DNScurve - also noting your other determined assaults a few months back. 
I'm not sure whether you're being malicious or paranoid: I understand the 
technical motivation for the latter but I think you've taken this far 
beyond healthy scepticism.

Andrew.
-- 
====================================================================
   * Custom email solutions * Systems Administration * Networking
	   http://www.acrconsulting.co.uk/email/qmail.html
====================================================================
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.