Re: Quick Poll: Would you trust system software from an anonymous source?

On 26 February 2010 18:05, Dean Anderson <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> By anonymous, I mean a source that traces only to an email address with
> no phone number, no address, no anything.  Not even a significant
> history of email from that account.  This source has no accountability,
> because they are anonymous.

Not necessarily.  Everything is traceable. Even an email address.  The
only obstacles would be one of cost and time in
doing the tracing ( which would obviously put your litigation cost up.
Whom do you wish to sue, and for what crime? ;o) )

> By 'System software' I mean software whose integrity a company relies on
> to perform its functions. If the software were remotely exploitable, it
> could potentially result in remote access being obtained, and/or
> confidential information being exposed, firewall being circumvented, etc

You're not defaming  Windows here, per chance, are you?

<snip>
'Dean is always available.. ' - ( do you not sleep? ) - '..to provide
personal input and advice and has helped us with upstream diagnosis
and trouble shooting when other providers failed'  November 2009.
</snip>

Are more details available on request, or does anonymous apply here also?  ;o)

Yours,


[Anon].