Re: Brian Smith asks: Who is Dean Anderson?

I did no such thing.  I called Brian's boss, and told him that Brian had
just made an on-list assault on me.  Describing my posts of actual hard
facts as somehow being "government conspiracies", "very elaborate
rants", and "wild accusations" are hardly in the realm of neutral
inquiry but are inflamatory and derogatory.

I also told him that if Brian wants to know who I am, he should call me.  
I gave him my phone number. Brian didn't call.

		--Dean

On Fri, 5 Mar 2010, Brian wrote:

> Hi Dean, and everyone else he CC'd.
> 
> I just wanted to take the opportunity to reply to your assault upon me.
>
> With my post in reply to Vixie's post, I simply wanted to ask WHO you
> are. To me, when you claim that an organization is so corrupt I
> consider put that into the "wild" category. Very innocently and calmly
> I inquired about who you are.
> 
> What I do consider entirely uncalled for is for you to call one of my
> co-workers and assaulting him over the phone and rambling on about
> government conspiracies and how I have somehow publicly defamed you as
> well as insulting me and my work.
> 
> I have nothing against you, I know nothing about you. However what you
> have done, I believe, is a grossly exaggerated response to something
> quite harmless.
> 
> Regards and have a good weekend, 
>
>-brian
> 
> 
> >
> >
> > On Fri, 5 Mar 2010, Brian wrote:
> >
> >> I don't mean to be naive... but who is this Mr Anderson guy? I've seen
> >> him have some very elaborate rants on another mailing list where he
> >> makes some very wild accusations. Perhaps I'm not "in the know" on
> >> this one, but he appears to really have it out for ISC.
> >>
> >> -brian
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On Fri, Mar 5, 2010 at 12:18 PM, Paul Vixie <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> > the behaviour witnessed below is prima facie re-evidence of the reasons
> >> > why mr. anderson was banned from the namedroppers@ mailing list.  mr.
> >> > anderson has added most of us to his namedroppers-honest@ mailing list,
> >> > thus allowing him to work around the ban.  i would appreciate it very
> >> > much if nick and others would resist the temptation to argue back.
> >> >
> >> > re:
> >> >
> >> >  4046+ 03/04 [Nicholas Weaver]  Re: (in)Security Analysis and Catastrophically
> >> >  4058  03/04   <Nicholas Weaver>  Re: [Namedroppers-honest] (in)Security Analys
> >> >  4078  03/04     [Nicholas Weaver]  Re: (in)Security Analysis and Catastrophica
> >> >
> >> >
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
> > --
> > Av8 Internet   Prepared to pay a premium for better service?
> > www.av8.net         faster, more reliable, better service
> > 617 256 5494
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> 
> 

-- 
Av8 Internet   Prepared to pay a premium for better service?
www.av8.net         faster, more reliable, better service
617 256 5494