Re: (in)Security Analysis and Catastrophically bad Design:

>>>> It seems to me that arguing against messaging opacity only makes
>>>> sense from a position with desire to monitor passing messages.
> 
>>>> Privacy concerns -- what dns i look up should be between me and my
>>>> selected recursive resolver, and not information available to anyone
>>>> with access to the intervening wires -- seem absent from the
>>>> discussion.
> 
> This is sad and true. 
> 
> According to my understanding:
> 
> a) DNS RR are public.
> b) However MY Queries and the Answers I receive from either the Content
> Server or the Cache Server SHOULD not be public and available to everybody.
> c) Google's IETF draft
> <http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-vandergaast-edns-client-ip-00.txt>
> would even make this situation worse.
> 
> Protecting 'private' DNS communication is legitime and a matter of
> "netneutrality" <http://lessig.org/blog/netneutrality/>.

All bow before the data mining overlords! Or is it Big Brother?