Re: alloc.c

Rhetorical question?

Why don't you use the mailing list to query, or simply ask him directly?


On 31 March 2010 04:17, Mark Johnson <[email protected]> wrote:
>    I noticed that fefe's latest ucspi-tcp patch ditches
> alloc/alloc_free and invokes malloc/free directly.  I wonder if that's
> because he decided the BSS array optimization was no longer a benefit
> or if it's just that he's linking against dietlibc, which presumably
> has a decent malloc() implementation?
>