Re: alloc.c

I wouldn't mind knowing the answer to this myself, just from a
programmers standpoint.

-brian



On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 11:17 PM, Mark Johnson <[email protected]> wrote:
>    I noticed that fefe's latest ucspi-tcp patch ditches
> alloc/alloc_free and invokes malloc/free directly.  I wonder if that's
> because he decided the BSS array optimization was no longer a benefit
> or if it's just that he's linking against dietlibc, which presumably
> has a decent malloc() implementation?
>