Re: alloc.c

Maybe Felix takes an occasional peek at this list?

If not, whose going to do the emailing/posting? ;o)


Chris.

On 31 March 2010 19:03, Brian <[email protected]> wrote:
> I wouldn't mind knowing the answer to this myself, just from a
> programmers standpoint.
>
> -brian
>
>
>
> On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 11:17 PM, Mark Johnson <[email protected]> wrote:
>>    I noticed that fefe's latest ucspi-tcp patch ditches
>> alloc/alloc_free and invokes malloc/free directly.  I wonder if that's
>> because he decided the BSS array optimization was no longer a benefit
>> or if it's just that he's linking against dietlibc, which presumably
>> has a decent malloc() implementation?
>>
>