Re: Fedora 8 bind-sdb and DLZ

On Tue, 2008-02-12 at 07:27 +1300, Glen Eustace wrote:
> Nice to see that you have followed the same approach as I did, I also 
> tried strings on the various libraries. libdns has a few more dlz 
> functions in it.

Hrm...

The binary it produces - named-sdb - links against a bunch of different
stuff as compared to the plain vanilla named. This makes a lot of sense
in view of the SDB and DLZ drivers. diff of sorted "ldd" output follows:

--- named2      2008-02-12 11:33:20.000000000 +0000
+++ named-sdb2  2008-02-12 11:33:26.000000000 +0000
@@ -1,22 +1,34 @@
 libbind9.so.40
 libcom_err.so.2
 libcrypto.so.6
+libcrypt.so.1
 libc.so.6
+libdb-4.6.so
 libdl.so.2
 libdns.so.40
 libgssapi_krb5.so.2
 libisccc.so.40
 libisccfg.so.40
 libisc.so.40
 libk5crypto.so.3
 libkeyutils.so.1
 libkrb5.so.3
 libkrb5support.so.0
+liblber-2.3.so.0
+libldap-2.3.so.0
 /lib/ld-linux.so.2
 liblwres.so.40
+libm.so.6
+libmysqlclient.so.15
 libnsl.so.1
+libodbc.so.1
+libpq.so.5
 libpthread.so.0
 libresolv.so.2
+libsasl2.so.2
 libselinux.so.1
+libsqlite3.so.0
+libssl.so.6
+libxml2.so.2
 libz.so.1
 linux-gate.so.1

I guess the more important question is... WTF is going on here? Why is
it ignoring the DLZ drivers?

More digging required!

Graeme


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/