Re: Rough development plan

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Mon, 08 Dec 2003 18:06 pm, Des Dougan wrote:
> Brad Hards wrote:
> > Each release is begun by defining the base environment (eg 6.1 will be
> > based on RH 7.3, 7.0 might be based on Fedora Core 2 or RH 9.0).
>
> Given Red Hat's stated direction, and the lack of clarity of how Fedora
> Core will develop, might v 7.0 be the time to address basing the server
> on a different distribution to provide a more stable base than FC may be
> able to provide?
Sure, hence the "..might be based..." wording. The decision would be taken at 
the beginning of the 7.0 cycle based on discussion leading up to it. The 
maturity of Fedora should be a lot easier to figure out by then.

Any feedback on the approach in a more general sense?

Brad
- -- 
http://lca2004.linux.org.au - I'm registered. Are you?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE/1CSCGwwszQ/PZzgRAoLFAJ0b4NzFJfO+DN+nkXoqNrqDvJyOlwCfaG1r
5IxpIDXWaWQlgNj+6DuahxU=
=HB8Z
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--
Please report bugs to [email protected]
Please mail [email protected] (only) to discuss security issues
Support for registered customers and partners to [email protected]
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
Searchable archive at http://www.mail-archive.com/devinfo%40lists.e-smith.org