Why was hop by hop flow control eventually abandonded?

Detlef Bosau <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.network.end2end
Message-ID <[email protected]>
I'm still to understand this decision. The more I think about it, the 
more I fear, that although the decision to abandon hop by hop flow 
control (which is still in Vint Cerf's catenet paper but is abandoned in 
RFC 791) may be the most seminal generator for PhD theses in the history 
of science, on the one hand, however I'm not quite sure whether this was 
one of the largest fallacies ever.

Actually, the VJCC kludge turned to be quite successful up to now, 
however VJ himself admits some basic limitations in his well known talk 
"A New Way to look at Networking".

Does anyone happen to know, whether this was decision for a concrete 
reason and the rational behind it? Or did this "simply happen"?

-- 
------------------------------------------------------------------
Detlef Bosau
Galileistraße 30
70565 Stuttgart                            Tel.:   +49 711 5208031
                                            mobile: +49 172 6819937
                                            skype:     detlef.bosau
                                            ICQ:          566129673
[email protected]                     http://www.detlef-bosau.de
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.