Re: Answer to Dave Reed Re: Fwd: Re: Question the other way round:
Andrew Mcgregor <[email protected]> Sun, 1 Dec 2013 16:05:12 +1100
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.end2end |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAPRuP3kXe0xnecucy=ft7byJVbPCzuCd+o+VF-pF_rHiUcW=sA@mail.gmail.com> |
The actual clearance rate from the queue (or the sojourn time), if that matters for your AQM scheme. That way you are not assuming a known line rate. On 30 November 2013 00:13, Detlef Bosau <[email protected]> wrote: > Am 29.11.2013 00:24, schrieb Andrew Mcgregor: > > In which case... measure, don't assume. Served us well for 802.11 > modulation selection, I don't see why it shouldn't work for AQM. > > > What do you want to measure? > -- Andrew McGregor | SRE | [email protected] | +61 4 8143 7128