Re: Answer to Dave Reed Re: Fwd: Re: Question the other way round:
Detlef Bosau <[email protected]> Sun, 01 Dec 2013 16:57:28 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.end2end |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Am 01.12.2013 06:05, schrieb Andrew Mcgregor: > The actual clearance rate from the queue (or the sojourn time), if that > matters for your AQM scheme. That way you are not assuming a known line > rate. Clearance rate or sojourn time? Clearance rate may apply for a packet delivery rate. From a TCP point of view, the sojourn time is the difference between the arrival of the according ACK and the time a data packet left the sender. So you omit any recovery latency. > > On 30 November 2013 00:13, Detlef Bosau <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Am 29.11.2013 00:24, schrieb Andrew Mcgregor: >> >> In which case... measure, don't assume. Served us well for 802.11 >> modulation selection, I don't see why it shouldn't work for AQM. >> >> >> What do you want to measure? >> > > -- ------------------------------------------------------------------ Detlef Bosau Galileistraße 30 70565 Stuttgart Tel.: +49 711 5208031 mobile: +49 172 6819937 skype: detlef.bosau ICQ: 566129673 [email protected] http://www.detlef-bosau.de