Re: Why don't we talk about segments/objects instaead of layers? Re: Lost Layer?
Detlef Bosau <[email protected]> Thu, 20 Feb 2014 14:26:16 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.end2end |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Am 19.02.2014 22:54, schrieb Andrew Mcgregor: > The best attempt at that so far as I know is "Joseph Hui and Ezhan Karasan, A > Thermodynamic Theory of Broadband Networks with Application to Dynamic > Routing, IEEE J. Selected Areas of Communications, 1995, v13 pp 991--1003". > It works, but isn't as illuminating as some of the more recent work, using > new mathematics to help. Keyword for that is 'network calculus'. > > Thermodynamic Theory. Please get alive. Cars travel along streets, people walk along the pavement, neither of them suffers from congestion related drop, neither knows about "Thermodynamics". I once was told a VERY basic wisdom of engineering. "What cannot be achieved by a simple means can neither be achieved by a sopisticated means". So networking should be done by simple, well understood mechanisms. I don't see a real use for overcomplicated calculus. Particularly when the models are not really close to reality.