Re: Etherboot and gpxe

Michael Brown <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.network.etherboot.user
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Friday 07 August 2009 00:02:10 Joshua Oreman wrote:
> The gPXE driver size is only a tiny bit more (500 bytes). That's a
> *mighty* large driver, though. There are only two in the gPXE tree that
> are larger in .text (tg3 and e1000). For comparison, rtl8139 is 3097
> bytes. It's going to be pretty difficult to make a 32kb ROM, even
> compressed, when your driver is 20kb.

Seconded.

You need to write a much more efficient driver, or just pay someone to do it 
for you.  (I'm sure Sun can afford the few thousand dollars it costs to get a 
gPXE driver developed, and the expected timescale is measured in weeks.)

You can strip out features to compensate for an excessively large driver, but 
you're likely to find that users actually *want* PXE compatibility, iSCSI 
boot, etc.

Michael

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day 
trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on 
what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with 
Crystal Reports now.  http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.