Re: freenet performance (was: Take down notices on Bittorrent

Matthew Toseland <toad-EI5O+8PHWbJeeLb3ft/[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.network.freenet.general
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Agreed re ideology. However:
- If freenet works at all well, it will be possible to stripe many
  transfers to fetch a big file
- There is reason to think that a large fraction of traffic is for big
  files (the 1M+ bar in the datastore histogram)
- There are "interesting" large files. Such as the Diebold files, for
  example.
- Freenet is slow for freesites. It's not slow enough to be unusable,
  but it's slow enough, and sufficiently rarely used, that a large
  fraction of its content is material which is actually illegal or at
  least sensitive. Some of this is regarded by most here as bad. If we
  make freenet faster, we will get more users, more content, and more
  non-controversial content, and more more mainstream controversial
  content. And maybe even the odd whistleblower/whatever posting first
  on freenet rather than ending up mirrored on freenet.
- There is no technical reason why freenet can't be faster than it is.

On Thu, Apr 07, 2005 at 02:14:59PM -0300, Caco Patane wrote:
> > > However the current 0.5 works pretty well IME.
> > that's great news.
> > how is performance compared to for example aMule or eMule ?
> 
> The main function of Freenet is not transfer performance, is anonymity.
> 
> Freenet is slow (my experience), is nice for text-based stuff
> (Freesites) and a few images. I have no experience retriving files
> with more than 5MB of size.
-- 
Matthew J Toseland - toad-EI5O+8PHWbJeeLb3ft/[email protected]
Freenet Project Official Codemonkey - http://freenetproject.org/
ICTHUS - Nothing is impossible. Our Boss says so.

_______________________________________________
chat mailing list
[email protected]
Archived: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.general
Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/chat
Or mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe
signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 189 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFCVauTHzsuOmVUoi0RAirnAJ0asvJyq/Cx/ubW9FI7sVNG0wgjFwCgpseL
YVRxuN5Wf1JVx+OTSS7WtCM=
=6Qtc
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.