Re: freenet performance (was: Take down notices on Bittorrent
Matthew Toseland <toad-EI5O+8PHWbJeeLb3ft/[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.freenet.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Depends on how you measure performance. :) Freenet does not really compete with emule. It's targetting a different market. As far as absolute performance goes, it depends on your node - on how long it's been up, how well integrated it is, how much bandwidth and store it has... On Thu, Apr 07, 2005 at 07:03:47PM +0200, Philippe Landau wrote: > Alex R. Mosteo wrote: > >Sadly I'd say the timing is not optimal, since the old development is > >being deprecated in favor of the revamped 0.7 release, which I see isn't > >imminent... > > > >However the current 0.5 works pretty well IME. > that's great news. > how is performance compared to for example aMule or eMule ? > > kind regards philippe -- Matthew J Toseland - toad-EI5O+8PHWbJeeLb3ft/[email protected] Freenet Project Official Codemonkey - http://freenetproject.org/ ICTHUS - Nothing is impossible. Our Boss says so. _______________________________________________ chat mailing list [email protected] Archived: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.general Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/chat Or mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 189 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFCVaq3HzsuOmVUoi0RAltmAKCq9B25FM5KznVJvtPZutKGSefUYQCgjYPF uLKd5FOxaoYuUqdeCsr20dQ= =wXDX -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----