Re: Re: freenet performance
Philippe Landau <lists-tF/[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.freenet.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Alex R. Mosteo wrote: > Alex R. Mosteo wrote: >> Caco Patane wrote: >>>>> However the current 0.5 works pretty well IME. >>>> that's great news. >>>> how is performance compared to for example aMule or eMule ? >>> Freenet is slow (my experience), is nice for text-based stuff >>> (Freesites) and a few images. I have no experience retriving files >>> with more than 5MB of size. >> My experience has been fairly good. Using Frost, I'd say I've >> retrieved > 90% of the large files I've tried. And the speed is >> usually quite good, again IME. Specially, for people used to wait in >> queues in eMule it shouldn't be a new pain. The Frost progress bar is >> mesmerizing to me... > Sorry, where it says Frost it should say Fuqid. so what would be your recipe for installing such a freenet ? i am planning to repost a step by step instruction if you don't mind. >> I guess the real pain is in inserting large files. I used to insert >> some text-only small sites and the time required wasn't negligible. >> In truth and IMO, a popular release site a-la somethingreactor is >> something bound to happen sooner or later, here or over I2P or >> something else. that would be a server announcing new inserts ? kind regards philippe _______________________________________________ chat mailing list [email protected] Archived: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.general Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/chat Or mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe