Re: Re: freenet performance
Matthew Toseland <toad-EI5O+8PHWbJeeLb3ft/[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.freenet.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
It is difficult to automatically assess what is available. 12kB/sec is the default output limit. Oh and 512kbps uplink is fairly unusual. There is an argument that we can abolish the default limit and just adjust based on ping times/messageSendTimeRequest... On Mon, Apr 11, 2005 at 07:44:42PM -0700, Todd Walton wrote: > On Apr 11, 2005 4:53 PM, Matthew Toseland <toad-EI5O+8PHWbJeeLb3ft/[email protected]> wrote: > > Bytes/sec. > > Assuming you're replying to my question about the units of > "bandwidthLimit" and the like, I have a question. My > outputBandwidthLimit = 12288 for my Windows node. I didn't set it > there, I just found it like that. 12288 bytes/sec is 98304 bits/sec. > My bandwidth is 512000 bits/sec. So, my node is limited to less than > a fifth of what's available? Is that correct? > > -todd -- Matthew J Toseland - toad-EI5O+8PHWbJeeLb3ft/[email protected] Freenet Project Official Codemonkey - http://freenetproject.org/ ICTHUS - Nothing is impossible. Our Boss says so. _______________________________________________ chat mailing list [email protected] Archived: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.general Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/chat Or mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 189 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux) iD4DBQFCXHL+HzsuOmVUoi0RAiVLAJMHx6m9eLL0FVIpB6ktAqbo5JWDAKC2WwUl /j90nbzhrdH0JrFfqKBiDw== =dcZQ -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----