Re: Re: [Tech] Crazy idea: How trust in darknets enables secure democratic censorship

Matthew Toseland <toad-EI5O+8PHWbJeeLb3ft/[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.network.freenet.general
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Wed, Jul 13, 2005 at 08:21:10AM +0200, Tarapia Tapioco wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: RIPEMD160
> 
> On Tue, 12 Jul 2005 22:59:13 -0400, you wrote:
> >
> > On 7/12/05, Matthew Toseland <toad-EI5O+8PHWbJeeLb3ft/[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > > /me renames Freenet PornNet. ;)
> > >=20
> > > I have friends who rsync their porn. But I can see your point. Is this
> > > an issue only for porn? What class of material is subject to this
> > > consideration? Personally I avoid material that could be used to
> > > blackmail me, traceable or not.
> >
> > And I have friends who watch porn in coed groups.  I think they're
> > weird, but then they probably say the same about my ex-poultry :)
> >
> > Other classes of material: anything that could be seen as incitement
> > to revolt probably counts.  The difference between rebels that history
> > approves of vs condemns appears to be decided after the fact.  Having
> > Freenet be relevant to revolutions would be damaged by this, right?=20
> > And it seems entirely reasonable for me to want to anonymize my
> > revolutionary plots by mixing them up with other people's searches for
> > deceased fowls.
> >
> > Writings about drug use also come to mind, though these seem to be
> > relatively accepted on the public internet.  That probably isn't as
> > true in, say, much of Asia, though.
> >
> > >=20
> > > Your privacy against local nodes is only an issue if your content is
> > > voted down.
> >
> > If you're not doing anything wrong, you have nothing to fear.
> 
> The problem with THAT kind of thinking is that over the course 
> of history, it has gotten a lot of people needlessly killed.  
> Don't forget the perfectly well meaning people who thought they 
> were being "Good German Citizens" by turning in Jews and those 
> who sympathized with and helped them.

The poster was criticising me. He didn't mean what you seem to be
reacting to.
> 
> PLEASE!  Keep Freenet Anonymous!
> 
> Keep Freenet FREE!
> 
> Keep Freenet UN-detectable and UN-Traceable

Right now freenet is detectable. It's not especially traceable though.
> 
> Perhaps next time it won't be Jews, maybe it will be some 
> perfectly reasonable person who just happens to have a 
> "Politically Incorrect" opinion, politics or religion.
> 
> Mark my words, someday there WILL be another Dachau!  The 
> question is, Will we sit by and be 'Good German Citizens', or 
> will we act in some way to help whoever's lined up at the ovens 
> next time?  The ghost of Bergen Belsen looms on the horizon and 
> the blood of ten million Russian citizens almost all innocent 
> bystanders waits to see how we will handle OUR turn.
> 
> May we Honor their sacrifice.

How does this relate to my suggestion?
-- 
Matthew J Toseland - toad-EI5O+8PHWbJeeLb3ft/[email protected]
Freenet Project Official Codemonkey - http://freenetproject.org/
ICTHUS - Nothing is impossible. Our Boss says so.

_______________________________________________
chat mailing list
[email protected]
Archived: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.general
Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/chat
Or mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe
signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 189 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFC1QkoHzsuOmVUoi0RAsbNAKChHLLe4u3lUmnvFeKUwBmTM0cbSQCeJKR8
k2kHGzr30MV12bfh8Ly6F84=
=ZaBp
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.