Re: Cache and Store

* Matthew Toseland <toad-EI5O+8PHWbJeeLb3ft/[email protected]> [2007-05-10 11:31:22]:

> On Thursday 10 May 2007 02:36, Juiceman wrote:
> > On 5/9/07, Matthew Toseland <toad-EI5O+8PHWbJeeLb3ft/[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > This is not exactly what you are looking for but I am 90% finished
> > coding a config option to have the store and the cache be non-equal
> > and user configurable in size.  This could be changed manually as
> > often as you wished as your store filled up.
> >
> > I was going to run it by the list after I had completed it.
> >
> > This was something that I wanted to see if I could figure out how to
> > do (whether or not it gets merged into the codebase.)
> 
> As long as it's an expert option, I don't see any reason why it shouldn't be 
> accepted.

Preventing users from their stupidity ?

We don't want everyone to have a cache but no specialized data on the
basis that "with a bigger cache downloads are 'resuming' ; I don't care
about others nor the network so I only cache"

NextGen$

_______________________________________________
Tech mailing list
[email protected]
http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tech

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFGQvlgU/Z/dHFfxtcRAmCyAKCLdIWZ9SaBD8F9IU5PHTNl2x7wxwCdFCCz
hNdfEjaZ9zNY66YgQG0Q47c=
=Gl4Q
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----