Re: Cache and Store

On Thursday 10 May 2007 11:52, Florent Daignière wrote:
> * Matthew Toseland <toad-EI5O+8PHWbJeeLb3ft/[email protected]> [2007-05-10 11:31:22]:
> >
> > As long as it's an expert option, I don't see any reason why it shouldn't
> > be accepted.
>
> Preventing users from their stupidity ?
>
> We don't want everyone to have a cache but no specialized data on the
> basis that "with a bigger cache downloads are 'resuming' ; I don't care
> about others nor the network so I only cache"

Fair point. If they want to break their node that much they can maintain a 
fork.

_______________________________________________
Tech mailing list
[email protected]
http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tech

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQBGQwfCA9rUluQ9pFARAqYYAJ44dT8EPT5ZQY+xql/jX8j9F44sswCeP4iU
3ShEcRUe/SbhQEexsRDpZhs=
=2Bfi
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----