Re: Jabber transport
Matthew Toseland <toad-EI5O+8PHWbJeeLb3ft/[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.freenet.technical |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Friday 16 November 2007 13:37, xpdf wrote: > Matthew Toseland pisze: > > On Friday 16 November 2007 08:33, xpdf wrote: > > > >> Jabber is good idea to make a freenet faster & moore knowing. The > >> protocol & servers is stable. Users & account are moore. many servers > >> have SSL. plugins to popular communicators. > >> > > > > By all means write a plugin to use jabber to exchange noderefs. > > > in jabber are 'transports' similar to plugins in servers. > I think about it. > > exchange is not neccesary. IMHO Routing all traffic through the Jabber central servers will a) be very slow and b) constitute a DoS in the eyes of most server operators. Jabber, IM clients in general, email, and so on, are IMHO in the category of either: a) Ways to get onto the network in the first place i.e. exchange darknet refs or b) Ways to stay on the network: Rendezvous transports. Transports which are used only for sending the current IP address to a node which is unable to connect because it doesn't know it. Eventually we will have plugins for both data transports (UDP, TCP, HTTP etc) and rendezvous transports (IM, email etc). _______________________________________________ Tech mailing list [email protected] http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tech
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 189 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBHPfifA9rUluQ9pFARAsaeAJ96Mmr+t3mTEgTTwbE0TExMctwoRgCfdhNQ hWGgd/y1mg+frKYcNUPw2Kk= =99G7 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----