Re: Jabber transport

Matthew Toseland <toad-EI5O+8PHWbJeeLb3ft/[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.network.freenet.technical
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Friday 16 November 2007 13:37, xpdf wrote:
> Matthew Toseland pisze:
> > On Friday 16 November 2007 08:33, xpdf wrote:
> >   
> >> Jabber is good idea to make a freenet faster & moore knowing. The
> >> protocol & servers is stable. Users & account are moore. many servers
> >> have SSL. plugins to popular communicators.
> >>     
> >
> > By all means write a plugin to use jabber to exchange noderefs.
> >   
> in jabber are 'transports' similar to plugins in servers.
> I think about it.
> 
> exchange is not neccesary. IMHO

Routing all traffic through the Jabber central servers will a) be very slow 
and b) constitute a DoS in the eyes of most server operators.

Jabber, IM clients in general, email, and so on, are IMHO in the category of 
either:
a) Ways to get onto the network in the first place i.e. exchange darknet refs 
or
b) Ways to stay on the network: Rendezvous transports. Transports which are 
used only for sending the current IP address to a node which is unable to 
connect because it doesn't know it.

Eventually we will have plugins for both data transports (UDP, TCP, HTTP etc) 
and rendezvous transports (IM, email etc).

_______________________________________________
Tech mailing list
[email protected]
http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tech
signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 189 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQBHPfifA9rUluQ9pFARAsaeAJ96Mmr+t3mTEgTTwbE0TExMctwoRgCfdhNQ
hWGgd/y1mg+frKYcNUPw2Kk=
=99G7
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.