Re: Jabber transport

Matthew Toseland pisze:
> On Friday 16 November 2007 13:37, xpdf wrote:
>   
>> Matthew Toseland pisze:
>>     
>>> On Friday 16 November 2007 08:33, xpdf wrote:
>>>   
>>>       
>>>> Jabber is good idea to make a freenet faster & moore knowing. The
>>>> protocol & servers is stable. Users & account are moore. many servers
>>>> have SSL. plugins to popular communicators.
>>>>         
>>

>
> Routing all traffic through the Jabber central servers will a) be very slow 
>   
not more than at present but people who use freenet they will be counted
in thousands
> and b) constitute a DoS in the eyes of most server operators.
>   
many serwer-s is very good
google wp.pl (huge polish portal) etc.
> Jabber, IM clients in general, email, and so on, are IMHO in the category of 
> either:
>   
Hm. why IM? If I tell use jabber protocol to free net not this same to
usem IM on freenet.

Tell me how many is of servers freenets? How many is servers jabber &
client jabber.
How many people write aplications to use freenet?
Rethink ;) about it.
> a) Ways to get onto the network in the first place i.e. exchange darknet refs 
> or
>   
jabber is naturaly. Naturaly colecting friend in my roster. I know this
people. The freenet growing naturaly.
> b) Ways to stay on the network: Rendezvous transports. Transports which are 
> used only for sending the current IP address to a node which is unable to 
> connect because it doesn't know it.
>   
Yes, but how many users? This is problem. Tor was broken therefore the
path message will be short (time), and there nodes are little
> Eventually we will have plugins for both data transports (UDP, TCP, HTTP etc) 
> and rendezvous transports (IM, email etc).
>   
I hate java ;) this serwer not working propertly on many net hardware
(routers, small or old computers) not working on many PDA. I think the
rewrite a small freenet on jaber protocol will be beter than the present
situation