Re: FMS (Java), WoT, ... - Work together!

On Tuesday 04 March 2008 18:04, bbackde-gM/[email protected] wrote:
> In the current discussions I miss one thing. Everyone wants to start
> his own thingy.
> It would be much more effective if all interested parties get
> together, decide about a design
> and then implement it _together_! SomeDude wrote fms and got some
> experience with the
> web of trust, now we start a WoT from scratch. Seagull already has a 
> working (not completed)
> version of FMS in Java, but we start something different?

It would be great to see some code!

> Is the FMS port unneeded then? Or should WoT and FMS be competitors?
> 
> No offense, I just wanted to read your thinkings about this :)
> 
> I also experienced this with Frost: I am the only true Frost developer
> for a long time now,
> and again and again someone came up with its own new tools. I love
> competition, but
> as you all know there is alot to do in Frost, and we would have made a
> much better tool
> for all users if we would have worked together on Frost.

Well, with FMS, hopefully there will only be one implementation for the 
foreseeable future. I get the impression batosai is getting impatient though. 
I would be if I wasn't barred from working on it. :)

_______________________________________________
Tech mailing list
[email protected]
http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tech

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQBHzZCvA9rUluQ9pFARAt+gAJ47C2U7RznAqvyup+f+XT004hHjgQCgmfO2
ESfKyEjiu/w87kRSkHc8skM=
=XkU3
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----