Re: FMS (Java), WoT, ... - Work together!

bbackde-gM/[email protected]
Newsgroups gmane.network.freenet.technical
Message-ID <[email protected]>
2008/3/4 Matthew Toseland <toad-EI5O+8PHWbJeeLb3ft/[email protected]>:
> On Tuesday 04 March 2008 18:04, bbackde-gM/[email protected] wrote:
>  > In the current discussions I miss one thing. Everyone wants to start
>  > his own thingy.
>  > It would be much more effective if all interested parties get
>  > together, decide about a design
>  > and then implement it _together_! SomeDude wrote fms and got some
>  > experience with the
>  > web of trust, now we start a WoT from scratch. Seagull already has a
>  > working (not completed)
>  > version of FMS in Java, but we start something different?
>
>  It would be great to see some code!
>

Ack! I am in contact with seagull, I hope we see the code in some SVN soon.

>
>  > Is the FMS port unneeded then? Or should WoT and FMS be competitors?
>  >
>  > No offense, I just wanted to read your thinkings about this :)
>  >
>  > I also experienced this with Frost: I am the only true Frost developer
>  > for a long time now,
>  > and again and again someone came up with its own new tools. I love
>  > competition, but
>  > as you all know there is alot to do in Frost, and we would have made a
>  > much better tool
>  > for all users if we would have worked together on Frost.
>
>  Well, with FMS, hopefully there will only be one implementation for the
>  foreseeable future. I get the impression batosai is getting impatient though.
>  I would be if I wasn't barred from working on it. :)

I understand, really. But Julien, do you really want to start with a
new WoT design instead
of using something which currently works (fms)? We have the C code for
this implementation,
and its Java port also (soon). Do you think current fms isn't the right thing?

>
> _______________________________________________
>  Tech mailing list
>  [email protected]
>  http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tech
>



-- 
__________________________________________________
GnuPG key:   (0x48DBFA8A)
Keyserver:   pgpkeys.pca.dfn.de
Fingerprint:
477D F057 1BD4 1AE7 8A54 8679 6690 E2EC 48DB FA8A
__________________________________________________
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.