Re: Distributed Drive and Increased Usage

Matthew Toseland wrote:
> That's completely different. Real time chat over Freenet, with both peers 
> anonymised, is not currently feasible (well there are prototypes with ~ 15 
> second latency, but IMHO it will be slow and rely on some unreliable 
> mechanisms...)

Hmm, I wonder if freenet would be usable for a twitter-style
communication.  Twitter's needs for "real-time" are much less, and the
broadcast nature of twitter might fit freenet's architecture.

Just a quick thought.

E