Re: Distributed Drive and Increased Usage

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Sat, 17 May 2008, Edgar Friendly <[email protected]> wrote:
>Matthew Toseland wrote:
>> That's completely different. Real time chat over Freenet, with both peers 
>> anonymised, is not currently feasible (well there are prototypes with ~ 15 
>> second latency, but IMHO it will be slow and rely on some unreliable 
>> mechanisms...)
>
>Hmm, I wonder if freenet would be usable for a twitter-style
>communication.  Twitter's needs for "real-time" are much less, and the
>broadcast nature of twitter might fit freenet's architecture.
>
>Just a quick thought.

Ah, but what would you call it?

"FreeTwit"?  Or better yet ... "TwitFree"

(sorry, I simply couldn't resist)







- -- 
My public keys can be found on my freenet site:
SSK@TEx6TiaPeszpV4AFw3ToutDb49EPAgM/mytwocents/63//m2ckey.html
(*NOTE* you must be running freenet for this link to be usefull)
and on public keyservers. Key-Id: 0x92769D7E
Fingerprint: 2F07D586C8D4EEA732711338CFEF46E592769D7E
I can be reached either by the NiM form on the freesite or by
Email: m2c AT nym.panta-rhei.eu.org
Frost: MyTwoCents@Z+59LNK9NhMvxewYggENU4Ww50s On the 0.5 Freenet board

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: N/A

iQA/AwUBSC8VVZ5/ZUtfDwnNEQJQxgCfcc8uvitY+sEYeYJS4rcDtiY4sWcAnjYK
hbeV494E2QJhBgxJREA8csL9
=xNyM
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----