Re: The name Freetalk is already in use
Matthew Toseland <toad-EI5O+8PHWbJeeLb3ft/[email protected]> Tue, 26 May 2009 23:37:27 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.freenet.technical,gmane.spam.detected |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Tuesday 26 May 2009 23:03:26 Colin Davis wrote: > Not for nothing, but I don't really think that Freetalk needs a public > name anyway. > Users Don't look at Freenet as a platform... We might get there someday, > but everything I've seen in the irc channel, the support list, and > talking with friends indicates that people look at Freenet as a program - > Advanced users think of it as a protocol, which is under development and > only used by Freenet, it's main program. > > No one I've ever talked to has thought of it as a platform for > applications to be developed on. > > This means that Freetalk isn't it's own independent entity, that runs on > top of Freenet.. FreeTalk would be "Posting a message on Freenet" > > > FreeMail is "Sending a personal message over Freenet" > FreeTalk is "Posting to a Freenet Forum" > Fproxy loaded pages are "Websites on Freenet" > etc, etc. > > I think this is the right behavior to encourage, because it helps make > Freenet understandable. In which case we simply have a menu item called "Forums", or something similar. > > -CPD > > > On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 12:18 PM, Matthew Toseland < > > toad-EI5O+8PHWbJeeLb3ft/[email protected]> wrote: > > > >> On Tuesday 26 May 2009 16:42:55 3BUIb3S50i 3BUIb3S50i wrote: > >> > djk@isFiaD04zgAgnrEC5XJt1i4IE7AkNPqhBG5bONi6Yks wrote : > >> > > http://www.gnu.org/software/freetalk/ > >> > >> Every reasonably interesting name is already in use. :| > >> > >> Suggestions for renaming Freetalk are welcome as far as I am concerned. > >> > > > > We should stick with "Freetalk" unless someone comes up with a clearly > > better name that isn't taken. > > > > The "freetalk" software you mention is not high-profile, and I think we > > are > > placing an excessive restriction on ourselves if we must find an > > absolutely > > unique name - we'll end up having to call it something like > > "f745jhgf!!&p". > > > > Ian. _______________________________________________ Tech mailing list [email protected] http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tech
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 835 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAABCAAGBQJKHG8nAAoJEHsvjZi+xPTDopIP/3KP6InyHsA5N9is7gTOq1DO Od6s0wLl9J11MSxduUrJaggZx9D8dyZ4umy4rx5v4cPMv9VdOkMmKYFV0Z7KuRHi T1Kf1hyWoNT4hqcVDqfYsSWOutxkkXHQ67h0OWpMZku9JjzAt5wJv0ivBhvLVaNU /m6GTHtOciEjnEj2dNgjqXAGwsLL836axR+jvGNjtNk6IE6gVfuOrv564cOHy41s +Mj9l5qKxJ0C4vDy4+PwZvpD+tNCCya1mbz5KUhNIdeVGuj1OS+AxLlAniGgo+6D YqP/GAd6pIH1FavlRZtoloptq5SVKnit9SBQp53CAy8B2uzHFS6HTo1QmwfHTtFH 4yTOXkEc5L4MhK+XP5JArUGQjAyrApQ4ecfEzUT6sVYMQAVuv0UzYIvPMieeH2tk 5ColgbzpXpLIPjb4MjjOA0Jyb99urvXxUTBgufWf6vftVrGnIx+aMIhehv4q/at2 s8SIGzDnzKUmveJ4oMDUol35OA6cdsmeep1TPLprPyDSPI/0uTIpfx7OJ29Uydlr TPLDcKABzljT1IZ9l+vxaZY1+U39VXZGjeA/JmQWo4lCVyi1qYBgsKG4LgvN857D yiviF24Hi/LXSh1ArWOH61lr1USosqPUO9k0XAda+DFqIlst/buhncdMBCgILpSV qotyDMXtjbFfm4KwQdBa =JHRe -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----