Re: The name Freetalk is already in use

Matthew Toseland <toad-EI5O+8PHWbJeeLb3ft/[email protected]> Tue, 26 May 2009 23:37:27 +0100
Newsgroups gmane.network.freenet.technical,gmane.spam.detected
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Tuesday 26 May 2009 23:03:26 Colin Davis wrote:
> Not for nothing, but I don't really think that Freetalk needs a public
> name anyway.
> Users Don't look at Freenet as a platform... We might get there someday,
> but  everything I've seen in the irc channel, the support list, and
> talking with friends indicates that people look at Freenet as a program -
> Advanced users think of it as a protocol, which is under development and
> only used by Freenet, it's main program.
> 
> No one I've ever talked to has thought of it as a platform for
> applications to be developed on.
> 
> This means that Freetalk isn't it's own independent entity, that runs on
> top of Freenet.. FreeTalk would be "Posting a message on Freenet"
> 
> 
> FreeMail is "Sending a personal message over Freenet"
> FreeTalk is "Posting to a Freenet Forum"
> Fproxy loaded pages are "Websites on Freenet"
> etc, etc.
> 
> I think this is the right behavior to encourage, because it helps make
> Freenet understandable.

In which case we simply have a menu item called "Forums", or something similar.
> 
> -CPD
> 
> > On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 12:18 PM, Matthew Toseland <
> > toad-EI5O+8PHWbJeeLb3ft/[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> >> On Tuesday 26 May 2009 16:42:55 3BUIb3S50i 3BUIb3S50i wrote:
> >> > djk@isFiaD04zgAgnrEC5XJt1i4IE7AkNPqhBG5bONi6Yks wrote :
> >> > > http://www.gnu.org/software/freetalk/
> >>
> >> Every reasonably interesting name is already in use. :|
> >>
> >> Suggestions for renaming Freetalk are welcome as far as I am concerned.
> >>
> >
> > We should stick with "Freetalk" unless someone comes up with a clearly
> > better name that isn't taken.
> >
> > The "freetalk" software you mention is not high-profile, and I think we
> > are
> > placing an excessive restriction on ourselves if we must find an
> > absolutely
> > unique name - we'll end up having to call it something like
> > "f745jhgf!!&p".
> >
> > Ian.

_______________________________________________
Tech mailing list
[email protected]
http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tech
signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 835 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
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=JHRe
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----