Re: The name Freetalk is already in use

On Tue, 2009-05-26 at 13:09 -0500, Ian Clarke wrote:
> On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 12:18 PM, Matthew Toseland 
>         
>         Every reasonably interesting name is already in use. :|
>         
>         Suggestions for renaming Freetalk are welcome as far as I am
>         concerned.
> 
> We should stick with "Freetalk" unless someone comes up with a clearly
> better name that isn't taken.
> 
> The "freetalk" software you mention is not high-profile, and I think we are placing
>  an excessive restriction on ourselves if we must find an absolutely unique name.

This appear as a licence violation; is it really necessary? 
Freenet need absolutely a clearly already taken name? 
In this case I suppose that someone can politely ask the previous
 art authors ....

-- 

+--------------- http://www.winstonsmith.info ---------------+
| il Progetto Winston Smith: scolleghiamo il Grande Fratello |
| the Winston Smith Project: unplug the Big Brother          |
| Marco A. Calamari [email protected]  http://www.marcoc.it   |
| DSS/DH:  8F3E 5BAE 906F B416 9242 1C10 8661 24A9 BFCE 822B |
+ PGP RSA: ED84 3839 6C4D 3FFE 389F 209E 3128 5698 ----------+

_______________________________________________
Tech mailing list
[email protected]
http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tech

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)

iQCVAwUASia0nYlqHjrHnYhBAQJzaAP+NdL41x6TStrgnwWyV/SPnTjj4zyejffo
l5wI9bUmy9MJWhJ6NVmZqQ2yBFzWGMl40bx9gN22LJoVPYxyhyEowNgo8m+mhFxP
B8jHBtCds4AqVdujAWIfzXTCpj50O4weqD6hec1kAATX7313m9Rc8zbtScRrOsr/
+7l3k1pc2ek=
=tet/
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----