We should name conn's begining with underscore
Hugh Daniel <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.freeswan.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
I just noticed this:
Feb 16 03:42:51 east pluto[24094]: added connection description "block"
Feb 16 03:42:51 east pluto[24094]: added connection description "clear-or-private"
Feb 16 03:42:52 east pluto[24094]: added connection description "clear"
Feb 16 03:42:52 east pluto[24094]: added connection description "private-or-clear"
Feb 16 03:42:52 east pluto[24094]: added connection description "private"
This means that FreeS/WAN has "default" conn's that have a
particular meaning to Pluto. These name (and thats all they are,
names) might be in use by FreeS/WAN systems now or easily used in the
future by someone not quite thinking about what they are doing.
I would suggest that we declare that any name starting with an
underscore ("_") be a 'system' conn'ection and that anyone fooling in
that space had better tend to their own wounds. Then we can change
the above names to _BLA before 2.00 goes out the door and hopefully
never have to worry about this minor thing again.
||ugh Daniel
Testing Fool
[email protected]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.3ia
Charset: noconv
Comment: For the matching public key, finger the Reply-To: address.
iQCVAwUBPk99wFZpdJR7FBQRAQGs5AP/RsNFR2ycwjQMpvR5jYqzjogURyT7zB8O
yEThqt7hGaPBFn9zNTo9UnRQhk+VStlUY4T7qvlkl/lAjM77HLjjWKRZEa52pFrA
lU32EMZ0+jxquPLKabmmXfCH7c4Z4hphA0ADMAVXijKF+MfJbD1h4oDG4gjrZCaV
vpn0MaErrxQ=
=y4Vt
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----