Re: Cannot bootstrap GNUnet 0.21.0

"Schanzenbach, Martin" <[email protected]> Tue, 12 Mar 2024 15:15:05 +0100
Newsgroups gmane.network.gnunet.general
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Hi,

did you try again the last few days?
We are currently observing better connectivity after fixing a 
configuration mistake on the bootstrap peer.

Best
Martin

On 10.03.24 15:41, marty1885 wrote:
> I deleted the databases for namestore and peerstore to get all processes running (peerstore and namestore was failing). But still no peer connections.
> 
> ```
> ❯ gnunet-arm -I
> Services (excluding stopped services):
> (started: 23 / stopped: 22)
> cadet (binary='gnunet-service-cadet', status=started)
> core (binary='gnunet-service-core', status=started)
> datastore (binary='gnunet-service-datastore', status=started)
> dht (binary='gnunet-service-dht', status=started)
> fs (binary='gnunet-service-fs', status=started)
> gns (binary='gnunet-service-gns', status=started)
> hostlist (binary='gnunet-daemon-hostlist', status=started)
> identity (binary='gnunet-service-identity', status=started)
> namecache (binary='gnunet-service-namecache', status=started)
> namestore (binary='gnunet-service-namestore', status=started)
> nat (binary='gnunet-service-nat', status=started)
> nse (binary='gnunet-service-nse', status=started)
> peerstore (binary='gnunet-service-peerstore', status=started)
> reclaim (binary='gnunet-service-reclaim', status=started)
> rest (binary='gnunet-rest-server', status=started)
> revocation (binary='gnunet-service-revocation', status=started)
> rps (binary='gnunet-service-rps', status=started)
> setu (binary='gnunet-service-setu', status=started)
> statistics (binary='gnunet-service-statistics', status=started)
> topology (binary='gnunet-daemon-topology', status=started)
> transport (binary='gnunet-service-transport', status=started)
> communicator-tcp (binary='gnunet-communicator-tcp', status=started)
> zonemaster (binary='gnunet-service-zonemaster', status=started)
> ```
> 
> On Sunday, March 10th, 2024 at 3:00 PM, Schanzenbach, Martin <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
>> Hi,
>>
>> what does gnunet-arm -I output? Are all of the services running?
>> For example, the peerstore database layout changed, so you probably have
>> to delete your old database ($HOME/.local/share/gnunet/peerstore/sqlite.db).
>>
>> The road to a stable TNG will also be bumpy, so we rely on reports such
>> as this to iron out the remaining bugs with it.
>>
>> BR
>> Martin
>>
>> On 10.03.24 06:08, marty1885 wrote:
>>
>>> Thanks for the reply.
>>>
>>> I tried a few commands and still feels like my node is really not connected. DHT can't put, NSE returns a very small network size and GNS cannot resolve.
>>>
>>> Is this expected?
>>>
>>> ```
>>> ❯ gnunet-core -si
>>> Current local peer identity: CCXHBE49GRQVFAVFQ3BXVXPHHD63NG6ZNY31R0F59KVDZQA42PTG
>>> (no further output)
>>>
>>> ❯ gnunet-dht-put -k "hello" -d "world" -e 40m
>>> (hangs, this used to return almost immidately)
>>>
>>> ❯ gnunet-nse
>>> 1710047156276913 1.688203 0.755488 1.474102
>>>
>>> ❯ gnunet-gns -u gnunet.gns.alt -t PKEY
>>>
>>>>>> Looking for `PKEY' records under` gnunet.gns.alt'
>>>>>> (no output)
>>>>>> ```
>>>
>>> On Saturday, March 9th, 2024 at 11:39 PM, Schanzenbach, Martin [email protected] wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> the behaviour of gnunet-core changed. You can check the new switches
>>>> with --help.
>>>> Long-term core connections are know to be problematic behind NATs, still.
>>>> But with a freshly started peer, "gnunet-core -i" should give you your
>>>> peer id, "gnunet-core -s" the connections (you can also combine the
>>>> switches).
>>>> The command should probably output the help when called without arguments.
>>>>
>>>> BR
>>>> Martin
>>>>
>>>> On 09.03.24 14:55, marty1885 wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>
>>>>> I've just built and installed the new GNUnet 0.21. But my node isn't connected to any peer after hours of waiting. Running gnunet-core shows no node is connected to me.
>>>>>
>>>>> `❯ gnunet-core (no output)`
>>>>>
>>>>> I have also checked `iotop` and can confirm gnunet-service-transport isn't doing much IO. While I was expecting at least hundreds of Kbps from experience in the past.
>>>>>
>>>>> How can I connect to the network? Please let me know what information I can provide to diagnose the issue.
>>>>>
>>>>> Best,
>>>>> Martin
>