Re: Cannot bootstrap GNUnet 0.21.0

I deleted the databases for namestore and peerstore to get all processes ru=
nning (peerstore and namestore was failing). But still no peer connections.

```
=E2=9D=AF gnunet-arm -I
Services (excluding stopped services):
(started: 23 / stopped: 22)
cadet (binary=3D'gnunet-service-cadet', status=3Dstarted)
core (binary=3D'gnunet-service-core', status=3Dstarted)
datastore (binary=3D'gnunet-service-datastore', status=3Dstarted)
dht (binary=3D'gnunet-service-dht', status=3Dstarted)
fs (binary=3D'gnunet-service-fs', status=3Dstarted)
gns (binary=3D'gnunet-service-gns', status=3Dstarted)
hostlist (binary=3D'gnunet-daemon-hostlist', status=3Dstarted)
identity (binary=3D'gnunet-service-identity', status=3Dstarted)
namecache (binary=3D'gnunet-service-namecache', status=3Dstarted)
namestore (binary=3D'gnunet-service-namestore', status=3Dstarted)
nat (binary=3D'gnunet-service-nat', status=3Dstarted)
nse (binary=3D'gnunet-service-nse', status=3Dstarted)
peerstore (binary=3D'gnunet-service-peerstore', status=3Dstarted)
reclaim (binary=3D'gnunet-service-reclaim', status=3Dstarted)
rest (binary=3D'gnunet-rest-server', status=3Dstarted)
revocation (binary=3D'gnunet-service-revocation', status=3Dstarted)
rps (binary=3D'gnunet-service-rps', status=3Dstarted)
setu (binary=3D'gnunet-service-setu', status=3Dstarted)
statistics (binary=3D'gnunet-service-statistics', status=3Dstarted)
topology (binary=3D'gnunet-daemon-topology', status=3Dstarted)
transport (binary=3D'gnunet-service-transport', status=3Dstarted)
communicator-tcp (binary=3D'gnunet-communicator-tcp', status=3Dstarted)
zonemaster (binary=3D'gnunet-service-zonemaster', status=3Dstarted)
```

On Sunday, March 10th, 2024 at 3:00 PM, Schanzenbach, Martin <schanzen@gnun=
et.org> wrote:

> Hi,
>=20
> what does gnunet-arm -I output? Are all of the services running?
> For example, the peerstore database layout changed, so you probably have
> to delete your old database ($HOME/.local/share/gnunet/peerstore/sqlite.d=
b).
>=20
> The road to a stable TNG will also be bumpy, so we rely on reports such
> as this to iron out the remaining bugs with it.
>=20
> BR
> Martin
>=20
> On 10.03.24 06:08, marty1885 wrote:
>=20
> > Thanks for the reply.
> >=20
> > I tried a few commands and still feels like my node is really not conne=
cted. DHT can't put, NSE returns a very small network size and GNS cannot r=
esolve.
> >=20
> > Is this expected?
> >=20
> > ```
> > =E2=9D=AF gnunet-core -si
> > Current local peer identity: CCXHBE49GRQVFAVFQ3BXVXPHHD63NG6ZNY31R0F59K=
VDZQA42PTG
> > (no further output)
> >=20
> > =E2=9D=AF gnunet-dht-put -k "hello" -d "world" -e 40m
> > (hangs, this used to return almost immidately)
> >=20
> > =E2=9D=AF gnunet-nse
> > 1710047156276913 1.688203 0.755488 1.474102
> >=20
> > =E2=9D=AF gnunet-gns -u gnunet.gns.alt -t PKEY
> >=20
> > > > > Looking for `PKEY' records under` gnunet.gns.alt'
> > > > > (no output)
> > > > > ```
> >=20
> > On Saturday, March 9th, 2024 at 11:39 PM, Schanzenbach, Martin schanzen=
@gnunet.org wrote:
> >=20
> > > Hi,
> > >=20
> > > the behaviour of gnunet-core changed. You can check the new switches
> > > with --help.
> > > Long-term core connections are know to be problematic behind NATs, st=
ill.
> > > But with a freshly started peer, "gnunet-core -i" should give you you=
r
> > > peer id, "gnunet-core -s" the connections (you can also combine the
> > > switches).
> > > The command should probably output the help when called without argum=
ents.
> > >=20
> > > BR
> > > Martin
> > >=20
> > > On 09.03.24 14:55, marty1885 wrote:
> > >=20
> > > > Hi all,
> > > >=20
> > > > I've just built and installed the new GNUnet 0.21. But my node isn'=
t connected to any peer after hours of waiting. Running gnunet-core shows n=
o node is connected to me.
> > > >=20
> > > > `=E2=9D=AF gnunet-core (no output)`
> > > >=20
> > > > I have also checked `iotop` and can confirm gnunet-service-transpor=
t isn't doing much IO. While I was expecting at least hundreds of Kbps from=
 experience in the past.
> > > >=20
> > > > How can I connect to the network? Please let me know what informati=
on I can provide to diagnose the issue.
> > > >=20
> > > > Best,
> > > > Martin