Re: Re: OOB Reply Delivery Protocol v3

"Ravinder Singh" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.network.gnutella.devel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Hi guys,
    I just came across ur discussion abt ppl who are already into a
development of a Gnutella client for mobile... or wish to develop one, i
just wanna make u guys know... that i'm also working on a similar project...
and its bascialy a college level project..i got no plans to release it
officially as its not going to be n full fledged implementation of gnutella
specification. Although if anyone would like to know more abt this... ur
most welcome...

Regards,
Ravii


On 2/16/07, Arne Babenhauserheide <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>   El Jueves, 15 de Febrero de 2007 22:55, [email protected]<Raphael_Manfredi%40pobox.com>escribió:
> > Honnestly, given the formidable effort it represents to understand the
> > Gnutella protocol and its myriad of extensions, plus the cost of
> > implementing and testing, do you really believe new clients can become
> > functionnal any time soon?
>
> I don't think they will have full functionality very soon, but I am quite
> certain that they will be useable soon, in their own special use case.
>
> One for example is being created for mobile phones.
>
> And I assume there will always be new Gnutella clients using new
> programming
> languages or toolkits, and they have it far easier than the pioneers,
> because
> they can look at the work done by other free software clients and learn
> from
> it.
>
> That's one of the strengths of Gnutella, I think.
>
> For examples, just think GiFT and Shareaza.
> They aren't the best implementations, but they are working
> implementations,
> and people use them, and Shareaza is the best example that new people can
> have quite disrupting ideas :)
> And GiFT shows, that new people can provide really new things, even though
>
> they sadly use a multi-network approach.
>
> Bets wishes,
> Arne Babenhauserheide
> PS: I don't use Shareaza, but its community seems to be quite driving.
> Still I
> think the concept of multiple networks for the same purpose (tag based
> searching) quite flawed. (Longer explanation in the Phex Wiki:
>
> http://wiki.phex.org/Talk:Roadmap#Why_we_don.27t_want_multiple_p2p-networks
> It's my work, and everyone on this list is free to use it as long as I get
>
> attribution. )
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
> 
>


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.