Re: Re: OOB Reply Delivery Protocol v3

Arne Babenhauserheide <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.network.gnutella.devel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
El Jueves, 15 de Febrero de 2007 22:55, [email protected] escribió:
> Honnestly, given the formidable effort it represents to understand the
> Gnutella protocol and its myriad of extensions, plus the cost of
> implementing and testing, do you really believe new clients can become
> functionnal any time soon?

I don't think they will have full functionality very soon, but I am quite 
certain that they will be useable soon, in their own special use case. 

One for example is being created for mobile phones. 

And I assume there will always be new Gnutella clients using new programming 
languages or toolkits, and they have it far easier than the pioneers, because 
they can look at the work done by other free software clients and learn from 
it. 

That's one of the strengths of Gnutella, I think. 

For examples, just think GiFT and Shareaza. 
They aren't the best implementations, but they are working implementations, 
and people use them, and Shareaza is the best example that new people can 
have quite disrupting ideas :) 
And GiFT shows, that new people can provide really new things, even though 
they sadly use a multi-network approach. 

Bets wishes, 
Arne Babenhauserheide
PS: I don't use Shareaza, but its community seems to be quite driving. Still I 
think the concept of multiple networks for the same purpose (tag based 
searching) quite flawed. (Longer explanation in the Phex Wiki: 
http://wiki.phex.org/Talk:Roadmap#Why_we_don.27t_want_multiple_p2p-networks
It's my work, and everyone on this list is free to use it as long as I get 
attribution. )


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.