Re: returning results for partial downloads
Arne Babenhauserheide <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.gnutella.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Am Montag, 15 de Oktober de 2007 21:01:39 schrieb Philippe Verdy: > I'm really convinced that the best policy will try not to maximize the > total upload or download bandwidth used, but the number of clients served, > even if each client is served completely at lower speed, because the same > clients will gain more by seeking for more other participants to what it is > requesting, and will use them. If instead of depending from a single > critical resource we depend on a much larger cluster made of heterogeneous > nodes, the stability will be better, as we can't predict how each node will > tune its policy. As long as this doesn't lead to a rotating queue (pushing me back several MB) I'd agree. Rotating queues are bad (in my opinion) because tehy disregard the user: "I just downloaded that file, why can't I download it anymore, now?" Shareaza does it, and I stopped downloading from Shareazas because of it. The host is offline before I can finish any file. p2p needs (sharing) users, more than anything else. Give me a mediocre network with many sharing users, and it willbe better than a great network with too few sharers. Best wishes, Arne -- Unpolitisch sein Heißt politisch sein Ohne es zu merken. - Arne Babenhauserheide ( http://draketo.de ) -- Weblog: http://blog.draketo.de -- Mein öffentlicher Schlüssel (PGP/GnuPG): http://draketo.de/inhalt/ich/pubkey.txt [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]