RE: queueing and priorizing strategies
Michael Rogers <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.gnutella.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Oct 15 2007, Philippe Verdy wrote: >My opinion is that this will not work reliably: others can lie. The original idea was that you'd directly measure the amount downloaded from and uploaded to each peer (as in BitTorrent), so there'd be no way for a peer to lie. Arne's suggestion (sharing information about the amount uploaded and downloaded) can be made secure against liars by using a Sybilproof reputation mechanism based on maxflow - see the paper linked in my previous mail for details. Cheers, Michael