Re: DHT traffic concerns

Am Dienstag 26 August 2008 14:28:54 schrieb [email protected]:
> I have not implemented any of the DHT modes LimeWire support, but the
> "active" mode, which means full participation.  The "passive" mode will
> come next.  LW defines "passive" and "passive leaf", but I may end up
> implementing only a "passive" mode, with leaves having a less deep routing
> table than the ultrapeer.  For instance, a "passive" UP can have a routing
> table going to the depth of 5, flat, whereas a "passive leaf" could be
> limited to a depth of 4.  That means 2^5 and 2^4 buckets of 20 nodes at
> most.

This alleviates a good part of my concerns. 

Many thanks! 

Arne
-- 
-- My stuff: http://draketo.de - stories, songs, poems, programs and stuff :)
-- Infinite Hands: http://infinite-hands.draketo.de - singing a part of the 
history of free software.
-- Ein Würfel System: http://1w6.org - einfach saubere (Rollenspiel-) Regeln.

-- PGP/GnuPG: http://draketo.de/inhalt/ich/pubkey.txt


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]