Re: DHT traffic concerns
"pwang708" <[email protected]> Tue, 26 Aug 2008 15:43:34 -0000
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.gnutella.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
> * The expiration and republishing periods are way too small and cause too > much republishing traffic. I am doing some measurement about this. BTW, where can I upload files (e.g., graphs) to this forum. > * The lack of usage of DHT STORE feedback (from the extended status code > list I published), driving the recognition that something is NOT rare > but actually quite popular. I see too many STORE for some keys, way too > many, and all these nodes must believe that what they publish is rare. > See next point. > > * The determination that something is rare and needs to be published is > faulty. The only real way to know something is rare is to try to publish > it and see how many STORE_SC_FULL or STORE_SC_FULL_LOADED error > conditions you get back. > As said earlier, I agree that it is a good idea to have clearer ERROR code. Figuring out data popularity without creating much traffic is a challenging problem. But I don't want to settle down with the idea of using STORE requests to figure out popularity just yet. Best, Peng