Re: Updated PFSP specifications
[email protected] Sat, 18 Apr 2009 22:21:51 +0000 (UTC)
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.gnutella.devel |
|---|---|
| Organization | Home, Grenoble, France |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Quoting Arne Babenhauserheide <[email protected]> from ml.gnutella.dev-forum: :Am Samstag 18 April 2009 21:21:49 schrieb [email protected]: :> The sole motivation of this change is simply to save bandwidth when "bad" :> clients request a highly fragmented file without honouring the Retry-After :> indication given for that file. Some clients will retry every minute even :> though the Retry-After header states 20 minutes. : :Wouldn't it be better to simply ban these clients, then? If I did, I'd ban 95% of the clients, roughly speaking, 4 main vendors (not counting the derivatives based on the same code but branded as another vendor). Raphael